<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Legal Blogs, Ranked by Traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2009/01/top-legal-blogs-ranked-by-traffic.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2009/01/top-legal-blogs-ranked-by-traffic.html</link>
	<description>Tracking new and intriguing Web sites for the legal profession.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2009/01/top-legal-blogs-ranked-by-traffic.html/comment-page-1#comment-11010</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 06:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2009/01/top-legal-blogs-ranked-by-traffic.html#comment-11010</guid>
		<description>its very easy to agree with technolawyer&#039;s comment. if web traffic is the deciding factor, anyone can buy web traffic…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its very easy to agree with technolawyer&#8217;s comment. if web traffic is the deciding factor, anyone can buy web traffic…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cates - Illinois Injury Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2009/01/top-legal-blogs-ranked-by-traffic.html/comment-page-1#comment-10307</link>
		<dc:creator>Cates - Illinois Injury Lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2009/01/top-legal-blogs-ranked-by-traffic.html#comment-10307</guid>
		<description>alexa becoming irrelevant - not yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alexa becoming irrelevant &#8211; not yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caveat Emptor ranked #50 out of the top legal blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2009/01/top-legal-blogs-ranked-by-traffic.html/comment-page-1#comment-1619</link>
		<dc:creator>Caveat Emptor ranked #50 out of the top legal blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 03:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2009/01/top-legal-blogs-ranked-by-traffic.html#comment-1619</guid>
		<description>[...] Bob Ambrogi just posted a link to the Avvo Blog&#8217;s list of the top 300 legal blogs on the internet. Caveat Emptor made it to #50 as of today. Looking good! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bob Ambrogi just posted a link to the Avvo Blog&#8217;s list of the top 300 legal blogs on the internet. Caveat Emptor made it to #50 as of today. Looking good! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With My Blog&#8217;s Move, My Alexa Ranking is Confused &#183; Robert Ambrogi&#39;s LawSites</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2009/01/top-legal-blogs-ranked-by-traffic.html/comment-page-1#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>With My Blog&#8217;s Move, My Alexa Ranking is Confused &#183; Robert Ambrogi&#39;s LawSites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 01:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2009/01/top-legal-blogs-ranked-by-traffic.html#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>[...] got me wondering where I stood. It&#8217;s been over a year since I last checked, at which time this blog ranked #30. When I checked today, my ranking had dropped to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] got me wondering where I stood. It&#8217;s been over a year since I last checked, at which time this blog ranked #30. When I checked today, my ranking had dropped to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynette</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2009/01/top-legal-blogs-ranked-by-traffic.html/comment-page-1#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2009/01/top-legal-blogs-ranked-by-traffic.html#comment-130</guid>
		<description>its very easy to agree with technolawyer&#039;s comment.  if web traffic is the deciding factor, anyone can buy web traffic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its very easy to agree with technolawyer&#39;s comment.  if web traffic is the deciding factor, anyone can buy web traffic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technolawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2009/01/top-legal-blogs-ranked-by-traffic.html/comment-page-1#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>technolawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2009/01/top-legal-blogs-ranked-by-traffic.html#comment-131</guid>
		<description>This list has two problems.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First, garbage in, garbage out. The rankings are based on Alexa, which attracted a certain type of person in its heyday -- and is now long past its heyday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.dailyblogtips.com/alexa-is-becomeing-completely-worthless/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Second, the list claims to be transparent, but someone made a call about which blogs to include. How was this decision made?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I welcome all new lists, but I don&#039;t see much transparency here (no pun intended).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This list has two problems.</p>
<p>First, garbage in, garbage out. The rankings are based on Alexa, which attracted a certain type of person in its heyday &#8212; and is now long past its heyday.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/alexa-is-becomeing-completely-worthless/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/alexa-is-becomeing-completely-worthless/</a></p>
<p>Second, the list claims to be transparent, but someone made a call about which blogs to include. How was this decision made?</p>
<p>I welcome all new lists, but I don&#8217;t see much transparency here (no pun intended).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

